000 | 01130 am a2200277 a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ESGN | ||
006 | |||||r|||||||| || | ||
007 | ta | ||
008 | b ag ||||| |||||||| ||spa d | ||
040 | _aESGN | ||
100 | _aFlournoy, Michéle A. | ||
245 |
_aQuadrennial Defence Review 2001 Working Group [Report of National Defence University] / _cMichéle A., dir. Flournoy |
||
260 |
_aWashington _bNational Defence University _c2000 |
||
300 |
_a64 p. _bilus. |
||
500 |
_aCurso CN Zaragoza=500\ \ _aNCC 2000 |
||
520 | _aCONTENIDO: Introduction. Twelve Strategy decisions for the next administration.- Four defence strategy alternatives.- Alternative approaches to force sizing. Assessing risk in the QDR. Strategy-Driven integrated paths.- Conclusion.- Appendix A: Risk assessment.- Appendix B: Force structure and capability issues. | ||
653 | _aESTADOS UNIDOS | ||
653 | _aESTRATEGIA | ||
653 | _aDEFENSA NACIONAL | ||
653 | _aFUERZAS ARMADAS | ||
653 | _aPOLITICA MILITAR | ||
653 | _aQDR | ||
653 | _aESTADO | ||
942 |
_cBK, _2Universal Decimal Classification |
||
999 |
_c23942 _d23942 |